5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
5 Simple Techniques For constructive trusts case law
Blog Article
refers to the landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
However, if the same person were charged with section 300 and 302, their defence that they never intended to kill the person – and that they just desired to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fail, as the elements in the offence only need the intent to cause injury for being proven, not the intention to cause death.
Case files may be accessed from the public access terminals in the clerk’s office of your court where the case was filed.
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
“Making certain the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple dependable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that although taking into consideration the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all the qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates that are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed through the respondent department just to extend favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part on the respondent department.
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were thought of for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars since arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is no more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him powering the bars before conclusion of trial will serve no practical purpose.
The scrupulous reader may possibly have noticed one thing previously mentioned: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses about the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two fundamental elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved unless case is tried(Bail Matters)
13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed at the time of your trial. The investigation of this case has already been website finalized and, thus, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any effective purpose at this stage.”
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged researchers to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.